Something that writers might want to take onboard when grappling with this particular obstacle is letting the world of the story inform the structure.
What made me think of this was recently watching the film Frost/Nixon. To base a film on true events presents all sorts of structural challenges (see: every biographical film ever made), but what Peter Morgan, Screenwriter Extraordinaire had in his favour was that at the core of his film was a series of interviews. The rest of the film simply fell into place around those interviews; the first act leads up to the first interview, the second act is the bulk of the interviews, the third act is the final, climactic interview.
This can be seen in series' of films. Each Harry Potter story, for example, is one school year at Hogwarts, beginning with Harry in the 'real' world and ending with the end of the Hogwarts school semester. It also works for TV shows; each of the first three seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer ends with the end of the school year at Sunnydale High (the structuring became a little muddier after that. The show also became not-as-good. Coincidence?!).
The West Wing's overall plotting was in part determined by the necessity of having elections within their fictional world, and the amount of time that would take; each season of Scrubs details a year in its characters' lives, and presents their professional progression accordingly; Slumdog Millionaire's whole story is wrapped around the rigidly planned events of a prime time game show.
In each of the above examples, while the challenges of structure aren't taken out of their writers' hands entirely, they are made immeasurably easier by taking into consideration the structures already inherent in their fictional worlds.
In my case, I'm currently working on a feature film script set in the world of suburban football. That setting easily gives me a structural outline to work with; the first act is the beginning of the football season, the second act the bulk of the season, the third act is my home team's grand final. Bam! With that out of the way, I can work on each character's individual arc within that.
This theory, of course, doesn't work with all stories. It may also be that while your fictional world does present you with structural guidelines, you have to dig a little deeper to find them.
When it does work, though, it can be hugely helpful. And if you find sitting down at your desk and Getting Writing Done as difficult as I do, you'll probably take all the help you can get.
Great post. I hadn't thought of this, but it makes perfect sense. This also applies to some TV shows about TV shows, when they're structured around one of its seasons.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I just read your post about McKee (since you didn't twitter about it - what practical use does twitter have besides letting people know when you've updated your blog?). The single most important piece of advice I took away from the course was: you don't start with the message. That would be dishonest. You can start with a hypothesis or a dilemma, but the message is something you discover as work your way through the story.
BTW, three cellphones rang when I took the course: the first person didn't own up and McKee yelled "COWARDS!". The second, a woman sitting behind me, immediately stood up and gave McKee a 10,000 pesos bill (about 18 US dollars). The third person was a woman sitting near the front who put a face of such pure horror, that McKee FELT BAD for her and gave her the other woman's bill.